Appeals attorney sitting with client
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Navigating the complex landscape of legal appeals demands a thorough understanding of two pivotal elements: legal errors and misjudgments. These elements can significantly impact the course and outcome of litigation, thus highlighting the crucial role of adept appellate attorneys. By learning about the intricacies of legal errors and misjudgments, individuals can gain an empowered and enlightened perspective on the appeals process.

Legal Errors

Legal errors, also known as errors of law, are mistakes made by a judge or a court during a trial that can significantly influence the outcome of a case. These errors may relate to the misinterpretation or incorrect application of law, incorrect legal procedures, or erroneous instructions to the jury. A ruling grounded on an incorrect understanding or application of the law constitutes a legal error, which can compromise the fairness of the trial.

For instance, a legal error might involve a judge incorrectly admitting or excluding evidence that could sway the jury’s decision. Or, a judge might incorrectly interpret a law, leading to an unjust sentence or decision. Recognizing such errors is vital because they form substantial grounds for appealing a verdict or sentence, with the potential of the decision being overturned by an appellate court.

Types of Legal Errors

Legal errors typically fall into three broad categories: 

  • Procedural Errors: These mistakes occur when a court doesn’t adhere to the set legal procedures during a trial. These errors can significantly impact the fairness of a trial and its final outcome. Such errors may involve incorrect handling of evidence, inappropriate jury instructions, failure to provide proper notice or violations of a defendant’s constitutional rights during a trial. For example, if a judge admits evidence that should have been excluded due to the defendant’s constitutional protections, that would be considered a procedural error.

These types of errors are often at the heart of appeals cases. An appellant (the party making the appeal) can argue that procedural errors were so significant that they impacted the outcome of the case or violated their rights to a fair trial. It’s important to note that not all procedural errors will lead to an appeal’s success. The appellant usually needs to demonstrate that the error was not harmless and that it had a substantial effect on the trial’s outcome.

  • Errors of Law: These occur when a judge misinterprets or incorrectly applies a law during a trial, leading to a potentially unjust decision. These errors can have significant implications on the outcome of a trial and often form substantial grounds for appealing a verdict or sentence. An error of law could involve a judge misinterpreting a statute, misapplying legal precedent, or applying an incorrect law to the facts of a case.

Errors of law are commonly the focus of appeals, as they directly challenge the legal conclusions made by the original court. When an appellate court reviews a case for errors of law, it often does so de novo, meaning it looks at the issue anew, without deference to the lower court’s decision. If the appellate court determines that an error of law was made and it significantly influenced the outcome, it can overturn the original decision or order a new trial.

  • Errors of Fact: Errors of fact occur when a judge or a jury makes a mistake regarding the factual aspects of a case, such as the events that occurred, the credibility of witnesses, or the interpretation of evidence presented. For example, a jury may wrongly conclude that a witness was lying based on their demeanor, or a judge might misinterpret a piece of evidence, leading to an incorrect factual finding.

It’s important to note that errors of fact can be more difficult to appeal than errors of law. This is because appellate courts often defer to the original trial court’s findings of fact, under the assumption that the trial court, which saw the evidence presented and heard the witnesses, is in a better position to judge the facts. An appellant usually needs to show that the error of fact was clearly erroneous and had a substantial impact on the trial’s outcome. In other words, the error must be one that a reasonable person could not have reached based on the evidence presented.

Misjudgments and Their Impact on Trials

Misjudgments in a legal context generally refer to decisions made by a judge, jury, or legal counsel that, upon later reflection, are seen as incorrect or inappropriate given the evidence or the law. Such misjudgments can significantly impact the outcome of a trial, often leading to an unjust verdict. For instance, a jury may make a misjudgment by incorrectly assessing a witness’s credibility or misunderstanding crucial evidence, which can influence their final decision.

A common example of a judicial misjudgment is when a judge incorrectly applies the law to the facts of the case, which could lead to an unjust ruling. Misjudgments can also occur when an attorney fails to make an important argument or to object to a procedural error during trial. Depending on the nature and extent of the misjudgment, it may form grounds for an appeal. If a party can demonstrate that a significant misjudgment occurred and that it influenced the trial’s outcome, an appellate court may overturn the original decision or order a new trial.

Role of Appellate Attorneys

Appellate attorneys play a crucial role in the judicial process, specializing in advocating for clients during the appeals process. Their work often involves analyzing trial records and lower court decisions, identifying errors or issues that could form the basis for appeal, and crafting persuasive arguments to convince appellate judges that a lower court decision should be reversed or modified. Unlike trial attorneys, appellate attorneys typically focus less on factual evidence and more on legal arguments, interpreting statutes, applying legal precedent, and advocating for changes in the law if necessary.

Moreover, appellate attorneys have a unique understanding of the intricacies and procedural rules of appellate courts, which can significantly differ from those of trial courts. This includes the procedures for filing appeals, drafting and submitting appellate briefs, and presenting oral arguments before appellate judges. 

There are many grounds for appeal in both federal and Illinois courts, each with its own subtleties and challenges. It’s important to work with a seasoned appellate attorney who can strategically guide you through the process and advocate for your case effectively. If you believe there may have been legal errors or misjudgments in your case and would like to explore the possibility of an appeal, contact The Keleher Appellate Law Group today.

About the Author
Christopher Keleher clerked for the Hon. William J. Bauer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.  This unique opportunity provided Mr. Keleher with an invaluable understanding of the inner workings of an appellate court.  He saw what persuades judges and what does not, and utilizes this knowledge every time he writes an appellate brief. The Keleher Appellate Law Group handles all phases of appellate litigation in federal and state courts across the country. Read more here.