Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn

Most federal appellate court decisions are not published. Indeed, the figures are quite high: for the fiscal year of 2025, the nationwide unpublished rate was 85.9%. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued the second lowest number of the federal appellate circuits, with 69.5% cases unpublished. Of course, per Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1, litigants may cite unpublished federal appellate decisions issued after January 1, 2007. 

While FRAP 32.1 does not address the weight that should be given unpublished decisions, such decisions are generally treated as potentially persuasive but not precedential. For example, in the Eighth Circuit,  unpublished decisions are not precedential but “may be cited for their persuasive value.” 8th Cir. R. 32.1A. Similarly, the Seventh Circuit provides that unpublished orders “are not treated as precedents.” 7th Cir. R. 32.1. So while parties are free to use such decisions in their federal appellate briefs, the unpublished designation will undercut the potency of such reliance.

About the Author
Christopher Keleher clerked for the Hon. William J. Bauer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.  This unique opportunity provided Mr. Keleher with an invaluable understanding of the inner workings of an appellate court.  He saw what persuades judges and what does not, and utilizes this knowledge every time he writes an appellate brief. The Keleher Appellate Law Group handles all phases of appellate litigation in federal and state courts across the country. Read more here.